Haircare · Shampoo comparison
Redken Frizz Dismiss vs All Soft: Smoothing or Softness?
In this guide
Frizzy hair and dry, rough-feeling hair often arrive together, making Redken Frizz Dismiss and All Soft look like two answers to the same problem. The useful comparison starts with what you want after drying: a smoother-looking finish or softer-feeling lengths. This guide compares the current US shampoos, their different cleansing bases and the routine behind their promises. Independent reporting and user experiences help explain the tradeoffs before the final picks for each kind of buyer.
The two shampoos start from different buying briefs
| Buying detail | Frizz Dismiss Shampoo | All Soft Shampoo |
|---|---|---|
| Primary brief | Smoothing and frizz control | Softness for dry, brittle-feeling hair |
| Useful starting concern | A puffy, flyaway-prone dried finish | Rough lengths lacking a supple feel |
| Current US cleansing distinction | Sulfate-free cleansing blend | Sodium laureth sulfate appears in the published list |
| Sodium chloride | Brand identifies the formula as sodium-chloride-free | Listed in the current US ingredients |
| Routine companion | Frizz Dismiss Conditioner | All Soft Conditioner |
| Shopping caution | Smoothing shampoo is separate from the range's leave-ins | Conditioning multiplier advertised for a system, rather than shampoo alone |
Frizz Dismiss Shampoo is positioned for smoothing frizz and improving manageability across hair types. All Soft Shampoo centers its brief on dry, brittle hair and a softer feel. Neither product name, by itself, tells you how the complete wash-and-condition routine will behave on your hair.
Use the finish you want as the first filter. Hair that feels reasonably comfortable but expands into a puffy shape after drying presents a different buying priority from lengths that feel rough when you handle them. When both concerns apply, decide which one most often makes you dissatisfied with your current routine.
Sulfate-free versus sulfate-containing is a real difference
The current US Frizz Dismiss list includes sodium lauroyl methyl isethionate, sodium cocoamphopropionate and sodium lauroyl sarcosinate among its cleansers. Redken identifies this shampoo as sulfate-free and sodium-chloride-free. It also lists dimethicone, amodimethicone, fragrance and babassu seed oil.
All Soft's current published US list begins with water, sodium laureth sulfate, sodium chloride and cocamidopropyl betaine, followed by dimethicone. It also includes fragrance, amodimethicone, glycerin and hydrolyzed soy protein. That makes the cleansing-base distinction more useful than assuming two gold-and-orange salon bottles differ only in scent.
Both lists contain silicones and fragrance, so this is not a choice between a silicone-free wash and a silicone-containing one. Likewise, sulfate-free labeling does not establish that Frizz Dismiss is universally less drying. If avoiding sulfate cleansers is an explicit purchase requirement, Frizz Dismiss fits that requirement; otherwise judge the finished feel alongside the rest of the routine.
Frizz Dismiss has a smoothing case and a fine-hair caution
In Glamour's May 2026 shampoo guide, New Jersey editor Jenifer Calle reports softer, smoother air-dried hair from Frizz Dismiss during a humid-weather routine. The article also cautions that it could be too hydrating for very fine hair. Those observations explain its appeal and one relevant limitation without promising the same finish for every buyer.
The useful reason to choose it is a smoothing-oriented wash when flyaways and a puffy dried shape dominate the decision. Its downside is that a buyer chiefly seeking airy volume has a different goal from the one the range emphasizes. A smooth surface and a lifted root are separate preferences worth deciding between before purchasing a larger bottle.
Redken directs users to apply the shampoo to wet hair, lather, rinse and follow with Frizz Dismiss Conditioner. Keep the matching conditioner separate from the shampoo when comparing your shopping basket. Leave-in products in the same collection are additional choices with their own directions, rather than automatic requirements for owning this bottle.
All Soft's appeal still needs a routine-level check
In a 2024 discussion of the two ranges, one participant with persistently frizzy hair favors the All Soft shampoo-and-conditioner combination. That account is useful because it shows that a dryness-focused routine also has enthusiastic users shopping for frizz, although it does not isolate the shampoo's contribution.
A contrasting All Soft user discussion includes an account of liking an initial wash, then finding the hair dry and easily tangled after roughly a week of using the routine. These are historical individual experiences, rather than a controlled comparison of today's two US shampoos.
The downside to consider is buying a large routine on the strength of one pleasant first wash. Begin with the smaller regular bottle if the product is new to you, and assess the feel after several familiar wash days. Observe softness, tangling and the dried finish together before deciding that more products from the range belong in the basket.
Compare the basket behind the conditioning promise
The regular US bottles checked for this comparison have the same entry cost and the same 300-milliliter size. That puts the decision on routine fit rather than an automatic budget winner. Larger sizes and refill listings deserve their own size comparison when you are ready to repurchase.
All Soft's shampoo page attaches its increased-conditioning claim to use with All Soft Conditioner and Argan-6 Hair Oil. Treat that as a system claim, rather than a result attributed to shampoo alone. The actual cost of adopting that advertised routine includes the companions you decide to purchase.
Browse haircare offers using the exact shampoo names. Our All Soft-versus-All Soft Mega Curls guide addresses a separate curl-focused range choice. If you already own a routine you like, identify the missing job before replacing every bottle at once.
FAQ
Is current US All Soft sulfate-free?
Its published ingredient list includes sodium laureth sulfate. Frizz Dismiss is identified as sulfate-free.
Is Frizz Dismiss silicone-free?
No. Its current US list includes dimethicone and amodimethicone.
Does All Soft's conditioning multiplier describe shampoo alone?
The shampoo page attaches that claim to a routine including conditioner and Argan-6 Hair Oil.
Are All Soft and All Soft Mega Curls interchangeable?
They are separate product ranges. This comparison concerns regular All Soft Shampoo.
Verdict
Pick Frizz Dismiss when smoothing a puffy, flyaway-prone finish is your main goal. It also fits a requirement for sulfate-free cleansing or a preference for a routine built around the Frizz Dismiss conditioner. Its fine-hair tradeoff deserves attention when airy volume is essential. Pick All Soft when rough-feeling lengths and softness lead the purchase. It suits someone comfortable with its sulfate-containing formula, a buyer already happy with All Soft Conditioner, or someone comparing the cost of the complete conditioning system. Neither shampoo wins on regular-bottle entry cost here. Start with the specific job your current wash leaves unfinished.
More to explore: Redken All Soft vs All Soft Mega Curls: Which Hair Type? · Olaplex No. 9 vs No. 6: Light Serum or Smoothing Cream? · How to Use Garnier Anti-Frizz Serum on Damp or Dry Hair